Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 163 Pa. Super. 484 - Thaw Estate

163 Pa. Super. 484 - Thaw Estate’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
October 2006
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently October 2006

3 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

901948195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Callery's Appeal · Mikell v. Philadelphia School District · Bayer's Estate · 138 Pa. Super. 385 - Dixon's Case · Girard Trust Co., Trustee's Appeal

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““‘Although the time for the termination of the trust has arrived in accordance with the terms of the trust, the trustee does not thereby necessarily cease to be trustee, but he continues to be trustee until the trust is finally wound up. The period for winding up the trust is the period after the time for termination of the trust has arrived and before the trust is terminated by the distribution of the trust property.’” Restatement, Trusts, §344, Comment (a), quoted in Thaw Estate, 163 Pa. Superior Ct. 484, 488 , 63 A. 2d 417 (1949).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““At least prior to the death of the life beneficiary the trust was an active trust; there is no semblance of a suggestion to the contrary. Upon the death of Henry Kendall Thaw, it may be that the legal title to the trust property passed to the remaindermen or his appointees. But we are of the opinion that the trust did not necessarily come to an end upon the happening of that event. His death did not make accountant thereupon a mere custodian, and the notice to take in kind did not ipso facto change an active trust into a mere custodianship «- * *»”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.