¶1 (concurring in result) : For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in the case of State v. Wells, upon the jury question involved, I would dissent in this case, but, since a majority of the Court have overruled the point raised in the Wells case, I feel constrained *86 to concur in the result of this opinion. Upon the other questions discussed herein, I concur.
163 S.C. 73
161 S.E 335
State v. Pridmore
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided November 12, 1931
Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1931-11-12
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 2000
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1931-11-12
View the full empirical analysis of this case →