Larue v. Patterson’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
July 2017
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 646 So. 2d 46 - Ex Parte Perkins · Phillips v. Phillips · Stack v. Stack · 376 So. 2d 737 - Young v. Young · 924 So. 2d 719 - Favorite Market Store v. Waldrop
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'The judgment was issued based upon ore tenus proceedings. Where the trial court's findings are based on evidence received ore tenus , " ' " '[o]ur standard of review is very limited.... A custody determination of the trial court entered upon oral testimony is accorded a presumption of correctness on appeal, ... and we will not reverse unless the evidence so fails to support the determination that it is plainly and palpably wrong, or unless an abuse of the trial court's discretion is shown. To substitute our judgment for that of the trial court would be to reweigh the evidence. This Alabama law does not allow.' " " ' Ex parte Perkins , 646 So.2d 46 , 47 (Ala. 1994) (citations omitted) (quoting Phillips v. Phillips , 622 So.2d 410 , 412 (Ala. Civ. App. 1993) ). "It is our duty to affirm the trial court's judgment if it is fairly supported by credible evidence, 'regardless of our own view of that evidence or whether we would have reached a different result had we been the trial judge.' " Griggs v. Griggs , 638 So.2d 916 , 918-919 (Ala. Civ. App. 1994) (quoting Young v. Young , 376 So.2d 737 , 739 (Ala. Civ. App. 1979) ).' " Sankey v. Sankey , 961 So.2d 896 , 900-01 (Ala. Civ. App. 2007).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.