Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 163 SO3D 598 - L.W. v. State

L.W. v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 80 So. 3d 999 - Del Valle v. State · M.W.G. v. State · JMH v. State · RDS v. State · 979 So. 2d 453 - Baker v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The cases discussing and interpreting section 985.437 universally require the trial court to make a factual finding that the child and/or his parent or guardian could reasonably be expected to pay the amount of the loss at the time the restitution is imposed, not merely when the court is subsequently required to enforce the order or determine whether the juvenile violated his probation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “is precisely the opposite of the restitution process for adults, which requires the trial court to consider the defendant's ability to pay only at the time of enforcement of the restitution order, not at the time the restitution order is imposed”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “for any damage or loss caused by the child's offense in a reasonable amount or manner to be determined by the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.