Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 163 SW3D 239 - Wiede v. State

Wiede v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
January 2007
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 22nd Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Carroll v. United States · United States v. Cortez · Adams v. Williams · Chambers v. Maroney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a statutory provision [cannot] erase Fourth Amendment protections. Although we acknowledge that an individual possesses a reduced expectation of privacy in a motor vehicle, this diminished privacy interest has been recognized in well established search and seizure law. We will not further construe this reduced expectation of privacy to dispense with the Fourth Amendment’s probable cause requirement altogether when a vehicle is involved in a traffic accident. 12”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[f|or a plastic bag to gain the significance attributed to it by the trial judge, there must be evidence that the seizing officer knew at the time of the search that drugs were commonly packaged in plastic bags and suspicious circumstances that would lead an officer believe that the bag contained drugs. 47”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.