State v. Hampton’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
4
states following
May 2017
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · State v. Grim · State v. Parker · State v. Nicklasson · State v. Marlowe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“First, a defendant must challenge one or more specific venirepersons struck by the State and identify the cognizable racial group to which they belong. Second, the State must provide a race-neutral reason that is more than an unsubstantiated denial of discriminatory purpose. Third, the defense must show that the State’s explanation was pretex-tual and the true reason for the strike was racial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. McFadden · State v. Broom
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.