Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 163 Wash. 484 - Grant v. Evans

Grant v. Evans’s Empirical Analysis

1931

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 1971
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lancey v. King County · Rands v. Clarke County · State ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. Clausen · Rust v. Kitsap County · Barr v. Cowlitz County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The argument is made that the construction of a second toll bridge across Lake Washington is not a county purpose within the first proviso of the twenty-seventh amendment to the state constitution, which is as follows: “Provided, That no part of the indebtedness allowed in this section shall be incurred for any purpose other than strictly county, city, town, school district, or other municipal purposes . . The resolution identifies at least ten county purposes. They are accurately summarized in plaintiff’s brief”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.