State v. Lilyblad’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. JP · Western Telepage, Inc. v. City of Tacoma · CJC v. Corporation of Catholic Bishop · State v. Roggenkamp · State v. Jackson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“may not interpret any part of a statute as meaningless or superfluous.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Allen · State v. Breitung“(1) Every person who, with intent to harass, intimidate, torment or embarrass any other person, shall make a telephone call to such other person: (a) Using any lewd, lascivious, profane, indecent, or obscene words or language, or suggesting the commission of any lewd or lascivious act; or (b) Anonymously or repeatedly or at an extremely inconvenient hour, whether or not conversation ensues; or (c) Threatening to inflict injury on the person or property of the person called or any member of his or her family or household; is guilty of a gross misdemeanor, except as provided in subsection (2) of this section.[ [2] ]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Meneses · State v. Sloan“`[m]ake a telephone call' refers to the entire call rather than the initiation of the call,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sloan · State v. Alphonse
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.