Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 163 WASH2D 558 - Pardee v. Jolly

Pardee v. Jolly’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Sunnyside Valley Irr. Dist. v. Dickie · 125 Wash. 2d 544 - Berg v. Ting · 35 Wash. 2d 223 - Martin v. Seigel · 24 Wash. App. 601 - Wharf Restaurant, Inc. v. Port of Seattle · 93 Wash. 2d 709 - Powers v. Hastings

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “only if a valid contract exists, a party has threatened or is threatening to breach the contract, the terms of the contract are clear, and the contract is not the product of fraud or unfairness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Third, the contract provides Pardee with the right to improve the property and testimony established that Pardee made permanent, substantial, valuable improvements to the house.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “`[f]orfeitures are not favored in law and are never enforced in equity unless the right thereto is so clear as to permit no denial.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.