State v. Setterstrom’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
May 2009
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Wilson v. Porter · 121 Wash. 2d 168 - State v. Collins · State v. Rankin · 116 Wash. 2d 509 - State v. Glover
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“officers may protect themselves when the situation reasonably appears dangerous, but a frisk is a narrow exception to the rule that searches require warrants. The courts must be jealous guardians of the exception in order to protect the rights of citizens.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Xiong“Without probable cause and a warrant, an officer is limited in what he can do. He cannot arrest a suspect; he cannot conduct a broad search.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Garvin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.