State v. Schwab’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Green v. United States · United States v. Scott · United States v. Tateo · In Re Orange · 119 Wash. 2d 401 - State v. Strauss
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Law of the Case Doctrine Restricted. The following provisions apply if the same case is again before the appellate court following a remand: .... (2) Prior Appellate Court Decision. The appellate court may at the instance of a party review the propriety of an earlier decision of the appellate court in the same case and, where justice would best be served, decide the case on the basis of the appellate court's opinion of the law at the time of the later review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gregory“[t]he plain language of RAP 2.5(c)(2) indicates that only an appellate court can revisit an earlier appellate decision in the same case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Kilgore“allow[s] a prior appellate holding in the same case to be reconsidered where there has been an intervening change in the law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gregory
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.