¶1Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the grounds, first, that it affirmatively appears that the terms of the composition agreement were varied from by the defendants without the consent of the plaintiffs, and it does not appear that plaintiffs waived strict performance thereof; and second, there is not a fan- preponderance of evidence of tender of performance of such agreement to plaintiffs on the part either of defendants or the United Hovelty Company. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
164 A.D. 898
Kaplan v. Feinstein
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 15, 1914
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1914-07-15
Decided 1914-07-15