¶1Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the proof adduced by plaintiff at the close of his case presented as a question of fact for the jury whether the father of plaintiff had emancipated the plaintiff, or had consented that plaintiff might receive his own wages. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
164 A.D. 902
Sullivan v. Schmul
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 15, 1914
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1914-07-15
Decided 1914-07-15