¶1Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, upon the ground that the uncontradicted evidence is that the defendants falsely represented as to the car “that they were thoroughly acquainted with it and knew its condition and that the machinery was in perfect condition and would need no repairing, and that said automobile needed no overhauling.” Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
164 A.D. 956
Brown v. Rosenson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 15, 1914
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1914-10-15
Decided 1914-10-15