Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 164 Ariz. 278 - State v. Dawson

State v. Dawson’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
2
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

66 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably State v. Brewer (1992), State v. Youngblood (1993)

66 state decisions

3901990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Wilson · Arizona v. Manypenny · United States v. Sanges · 484 So. 2d 122 - State v. Fraser · 106 Wis. 2d 368 - State v. Alles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Upon an appeal by the defendant either from a judgment of conviction or from sentence, if an illegal sentence has been imposed upon a lawful verdict or finding of guilty by the trial court, the supreme court shall correct the sentence to correspond to the verdict or finding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he trial court's failure to impose a legal sentence is one of those rare situations from which the state can seek review even if it failed to object in the trial court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Obviously, a judgment not appealed from cannot be corrected by an appellate court no matter how blatantly and publicly the error appears on the face of the record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.