State v. Harrison’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
33 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1 · 18 U.S.C. § 19
Relies on Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Independent Federation of Flight Attendants · Bauer v. Waldschmidt · Blanton v. City of North Las Vegas · Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima County · Bruce v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The second reason why defendant is not entitled to a jury trial is that he failed to timely request one. Arizona law requires a party to demand a jury at least five days before a trial commences; failure to do so waives that right. A.R.S. § 22-320(A). In the present case, he did not request a jury trial until he appealed to the superior court. Therefore, even if there was such a right to a jury, it was waived.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Flournoy“[g]auging the seriousness of a crime based upon how the judiciary perceives that society might perceive a crime leads to confusion and imprecision.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(1) the defendant is exposed to a severe penalty, i.e. a penalty in which the exposure exceeds six months imprisonment or $1,000 infines[] ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.