Vickrey v. Maier’s Empirical Analysis
1912
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently September 2006 · most notably Lien Huynh v. Chase Manhattan Bank (2006), Pedro v. Soares (1937)
4 federal appellate · 34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Thomas v. Pacific Beach Co. · Williams v. Bergin · Bills v. Silver King Mining Co. · Jameson v. Jameson · Sels v. Bunnell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Unless there are peculiar circumstances affecting the question [of laches], a time coincident with that of the statute of limitations, will be deemed reasonable.’’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“peculiar circumstances affecting the question”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Angellotti, J., and Sloss, J., concurred.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Vickrey v. Jones
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.