Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 164 Cal. App. 3d 206 - Andre v. Ingram

164 Cal. App. 3d 206 - Andre v. Ingram’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
June 2014
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently June 2014

19 state decisions

1001985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 17 Cal. 3d 425 - Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California · 5 Cal. 3d 153 - Vesely v. Sager · 24 Cal. 3d 890 - Taylor v. Superior Court · 35 Cal. 3d 257 - Burg v. Municipal Court · 21 Cal. 3d 144 - Coulter v. Superior Court

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he effect of the statute cannot be avoided by alleging the wrong, not as furnishing the alcohol,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the consumption of alcoholic beverages is the proximate cause of injuries inflicted upon another by an intoxicated person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.