Baglin v. Cusenier Co.’s Empirical Analysis
164 F. 25 · 1908
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
March 1919
most recently cited
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Siegert v. Gandolfi · Sarrazin v. W. R. Irby Cigar & Tobacco Co. · A. Bauer & Co. v. Order of Carthusian Monks · Baglin v. Cusenier Co. · Baglin v. Cusenier Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Its [‘Chartreuse’] primary meaning was undoubtedly geographical, but it acquired afterwards a secondary meaning, so that a purchaser prior to 1901 ordering a case of ‘Chartreuse’ would expect to receive liqueur made by monks at the French monastery.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.