Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 164 F.1d 604 - McGilvra v. Ross

McGilvra v. Ross’s Empirical Analysis

164 F. 604 · 1908

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
March 1913
most recently cited

1 district ·

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on Shively v. Bowlby · Duncan v. Missouri · Shoshone Mining Co. v. Rutter · Newburyport Water Company v. City of Newburyport · Packer v. Bird

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If jurisdiction is to be determined by the mere fact that the bill alleged constitutional questions, there was, of course, jurisdiction. But that is not the sole criterion. On the contrary, it is settled that jurisdiction does not arise simply because an averment is made as to the existence of a constitutional question, if it plainly appears that such averment is not' real and substantial, but is without color of merit.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.