Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

164 F. 679

Docket No. 1,604.

Bartnett v. Major

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided October 5, 1908.)

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1908-10-05

<p>Petition for Revision of Proceedings of the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California, in Bankruptcy.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1908

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Brown v. Major

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1908-10-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Petition for Revision of Proceedings of the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California, in Bankruptcy.

¶2Charles R. Gray and Gray & Cooper, for petitioner.

¶3Daniel O’Connell, for respondents.

¶4Before GILBERT, ROSS, and MORROW, Circuit Judges.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6On the authority of the case of J. Dalzell Brown, Petitioner, v. Frieda R. Major and Others, Respondents, 164 Fed. 673, the petition for revision is dismissed at the petitioner’s cost.

/164/f1d/679 · .json · Public domain