Setgel v. Cartel’s Empirical Analysis
164 F. 691 · 1908
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 1967
7 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In re Leslie · In re Meyers · In re Deuell · In re Finkelstein · In re Morgan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where a bankrupt fails to schedule or to surrender to bis trustee goods shown to have been in his possession a short time prior to his bankruptcy, the burden rests upon him to account for the same, and if he fails to do so, the presumption is that he sold them and conceals the proceeds.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Brincat““Not having scheduled or surrendered the property to the trustee, the concealment of the proceeds, within the provisions of the statute, is presumed.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.