Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 164 F.1d 71 - In re Gitkin

In re Gitkin’s Empirical Analysis

164 F. 71 · 1908

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
May 1972
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1972

4 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions

4019081910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex parte Robinson · Batchelder v. Moore · United States v. Anonymous · In re Fellerman · Osborne v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The referee shall certify thé facts to the judge if any person shall do any of the things forbidden in this section. The judge shall thereupon in summary manner hear the evidence as to the acts complained of and if it is such as to warrant him in so doing punish the person in the same manner and to the same extent as for a contempt committed before the court of bankruptcy.” Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 556 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3437).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he power of the courts to punish for contempt has always been looked on in this country with much jealousy, and a very strong disposition shown in all jurisdictions to restrain it. It has been declared to be arbitrary in its nature * * *, and to be an exception to the provisions of the Constitution of the United States and not to be extended in the least degree beyond the limits imposed by statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.