Campfield v. Sauer’s Empirical Analysis
164 F. 833 · 1908
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
April 1928
most recently cited
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Loudenback Fertilizer Co. v. Tennessee Phosphate Co. · Lima Locomotive & Machine Co. v. National Steel Castings Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘Ann Arbor, Mieb., July 8, 1905. “Mr. E. M. Campfield, General Contractor, High. School and Library, Ann' Arbor, Michigan — Dear Sir: We will furnish yon all the timber as below, sizes and prices hereafter named and specified free on board cars Ann Arbor, Mich.. Ann Arbor Ry. delivery, for the High School and Library Building. Quality to be as per specifications for said building, all as per sizes and specifications, which you are to furnish us. And will do all in our power to get a quick delivery, especially the first floor tier of floor joist. (The following prices are net.)””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Campfield v. Sauer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.