Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 164 F.2d 700 - In re Hubbell

In re Hubbell’s Empirical Analysis

164 F.2d 700 · 1947

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
March 1963
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Loom Company v. Higgins · Potts v. Creager · Krementz v. S. Cottle Co. · Canda v. Michigan Malleable Iron Co. · In re Otto

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The parties making the affidavits of record, being users of appellant’s device and who so highly commend it never thought of doing what appellant did, notwithstanding White’s suggestion and their familiarity with the White device, and it seems to us that it was the unobvious thing to do and no doubt was the successful result of a trial which had been intentionally avoided by others.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.