Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 164 F.3d 589 - Jones v. Garner

Jones v. Garner’s Empirical Analysis

164 F.3d 589 · 1999

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2015

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

60199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Weaver v. Graham · Dobbert v. Florida · Miller v. Florida · Calder et Wife, v. Bull et Wife. · California Department of Corrections v. Morales

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he question is `a matter of degree' . . . [t]he controlling inquiry in [Morales]. . . was whether retroactive application of the change in California law created `a sufficient risk of increasing the measure of punishment attached to the covered crimes.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “many inmates who can expect to be paroled . . . seems certain to ensure that some number of inmates will find the length of their incarceration extended in violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause . . . .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[p]olicy statements, unlike regulations are unenforceable and easily changed, and adherence to them is a matter of the Board's discretion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.