¶1 Michael R. Godwin appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Godwin’s motion for x-rays and doctor’s reports, and we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Godwin v. Entzminger, No. CA-03-804-2 (E.D. Va. filed July 21, 2005; entered July 22, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶2 AFFIRMED