Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 164 Ga. App. 163 - Amear v. Hall

164 Ga. App. 163 - Amear v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
2
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently August 2015 · most notably Robinson v. Kroger Co. (1997), 169 Ga. App. 167 - Abee v. Stone Mountain Memorial Ass'n (1983)

6 federal appellate · 45 state decisions

2201982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Alterman Foods, Inc. v. Ligon · 158 Ga. App. 166 - Pound v. Augusta National, Inc. · 110 Ga. App. 170 - Gibson v. Consolidated Credit Corp. · Fulton Ice & Coal Co. v. Pece · Atlanta & Florida Railroad v. Kimberly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The test historically applied by this Court has been . . . whether the employer, under the contract, whether oral or written, has the right to direct the time, the manner, the methods, and the means of the execution of the work, as contradistinguished from the right to insist upon the contractor producing results according to the contract, or whether the contractor in the performance of the work contracted for is free from any control by the employer of the time, manner, and method in the performance of the work. [Cits.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “This duty requires the owner or occupier of land to exercise ordinary care for the safety of his invitees in discovering defects or danger in the premises and imposes liability for injuries resulting from such defects as a reasonable inspection would disclose.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “there is no liability for harm resulting from conditions from which no unreasonable risk was to be anticipated, or those which the occupier did not know and could not have discovered with reasonable care.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.