Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 164 Ga. App. 191 - Noles v. State

164 Ga. App. 191 - Noles v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
3
states following
October 1992
most recently cited

19 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dyke v. Georgia · Dyke v. State · Gregoroff v. State · Stapleton v. State · 159 Ga. App. 642 - Hester v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In prosecutions under [OCGA § 40-5-58 (c)], the state is required to prove that the defendant was declared an habitual violator; that his license was revoked; that he received notice that his license was revoked because of his status as an habitual violator; and, that he operated a motor vehicle in this state without having obtained a valid driver's license. See Hester v. State, 159 Ga. App. 642, 643-644 (2) ( 284 SE2d 659 ). The information in the computer printout of defendant's driving record showing these facts was essential to the conviction of the crime, but the additional material contained therein was irrelevant. Hester v. State, supra. However, as the court stated in Hester v. State , supra, at page 644, `the mere fact that evidence is "immaterial”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]e fail to see how defendant could have been prejudiced by the admission of the entire driving record. The relevant evidence of him being an habitual violator [on April 6, 1984] was undisputed and conclusive. See Moon v. State, 156 Ga. App. 877 (1) ( 275 SE2d 813 ); Hight v. State, 153 Ga. App. 196 (2) ( 264 SE2d 717 ).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.