164 Md. App. 1 - Logan v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 2024
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · Arizona v. Fulminante · Colorado v. Connelly · Moran v. Burbine
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although an express written or oral statement of waiver of the right to remain silent ... is usually strong proof of the validity of that waiver, [it] is not inevitably ... sufficient to establish waiver.... [I]t would be absurd to think that mere recitation of the litany [of Miranda rights] suffices to satisfy Miranda in every conceivable circumstance. And, in contrast to traditional voluntariness, there is an absolute prohibition upon any trickery which misleads the suspect as to the existence or dimensions of any of the applicable [.Miranda ] rights[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In particular, [the detective] never undertook to make clear to appellant that the two were no longer “just talking ”; he did not dispel the notion that no “harm” would come to appellant if he made a statement; and he did not clarify that the truth would “jeopardize ” appellant. Therefore, the advisement remained fatally flawed. For this reason, we conclude that the court erred by denying appellant’s motion to suppress.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“First, the relinquishment of the right must have been voluntary in the sense that it was the product of a free and deliberate choice rather than intimidation, coercion, or deception. Second, the waiver must have been made with a full awareness both of the nature of the right being abandoned and the consequences of the decision to abandon it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.