Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 164 Minn. 199 - Workman v. Endriss

Workman v. Endriss’s Empirical Analysis

1925

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
May 1959
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 1959

8 state decisions

301925193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State ex rel. Lennon v. District Court · State ex rel. City of Northfield v. District Court of Rice County · Klein v. McCleary · State ex rel. Nienaber v. District Court

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Although plaintiff’s employment may have been casual, it was in the usual course of the business of his employer, and he was therefore within the compensation act.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.