164 N.C. App. 120 - State v. Borders’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Avery · State v. Cummings · State v. Walls · State v. Ledford · State v. Canady
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“made no specific mention of any particular element of the offense charged or that defendant had admitted robbing [the victim] with a dangerous weapon - only that the evidence tended to show an admission by defendant of 'one or more facts relating to the crime charged[.]'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“is unnecessary because it is clear that a defendant does 'not want the [trial] court to find [an] aggravating factor and the [trial] court kn[ows] or should ... know[ ] it'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[I]n order for an aggravating factor to be reasonably related to the purposes of sentencing it must be reasonably related to the crime for which defendant was convicted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Adams
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.