Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 164 N.C. App. 120 - State v. Borders

164 N.C. App. 120 - State v. Borders’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Avery · State v. Cummings · State v. Walls · State v. Ledford · State v. Canady

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “made no specific mention of any particular element of the offense charged or that defendant had admitted robbing [the victim] with a dangerous weapon - only that the evidence tended to show an admission by defendant of 'one or more facts relating to the crime charged[.]'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “is unnecessary because it is clear that a defendant does 'not want the [trial] court to find [an] aggravating factor and the [trial] court kn[ows] or should ... know[ ] it'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[I]n order for an aggravating factor to be reasonably related to the purposes of sentencing it must be reasonably related to the crime for which defendant was convicted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.