164 N.C. App. 272 - State v. Forrest’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
47
cited by 47 later decisions
10
states following
November 2006
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 42 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · New Jersey v. New York · Berkery v. Commissioner · State v. Gaines
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]estimonial evidence refers to evidence produced by witnesses against a criminal defendant. Such witnesses, who bear testimony, are the subject of the Sixth Amendment. The United States Supreme Court determined in Crawford that at a minimum the term testimonial applies to prior testimony at a preliminary hearing, before a grand jury, or at a former trial; and to police interrogations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[u]nder Crawford, a Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause analysis is whether a particular statement is testimonial or non-testimonial in nature, and not whether the statements offered into evidence fall into a well-rooted hearsay exception, such as the 'excited utterance' exception.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A statement relating to a startling event or condition made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement caused by the event or condition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.