Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 164 N.C. App. 444 - Chick v. Chick

164 N.C. App. 444 - Chick v. Chick’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
10
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

29 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Shute v. Shute · 74 N.C. App. 1 - Hart v. Hart · T.H. v. A.S. · 100 N.C. App. 379 - Pheasant v. McKibben · 98 N.C. App. 493 - Matter of Custody of Bhatti

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the opportunity to present facts and legal arguments before a decision on jurisdiction is made.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[The totality of the circumstances test] provides greater flexibility to the court making the determination by allowing for consideration of additional circumstances that may be presented in the multiplicity of factual settings in which child custody jurisdictional issues may arise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) looking at the duration of absence, (2) examining whether the parties intended the absence to be permanent or temporary, and (3) adopting a totality of the circumstances approach to determine whether the absence was merely a temporary absence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.