Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 164 N.C. App. 708 - State v. Benardello

164 N.C. App. 708 - State v. Benardello’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Stenberg v. Carhart · Howe v. Richardson · State v. Gregory · State v. Morganherring · 76 N.C. App. 660 - State v. Massey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hile conspiracy can be proved by inferences and circumstantial evidence, it cannot be established by a mere suspicion, nor does a mere relationship between the parties or association show a conspiracy.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A mutual, implied understanding is sufficient, so far as the combination or conspiracy is concerned, to constitute the offense. The existence of a conspiracy may be shown with direct or circumstantial evidence. The proof of a conspiracy may be, and generally is, established by a number of indefinite acts, each of which, standing alone, might have little weight, but, taken collectively, they point unerringly to the existence of a conspiracy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.