State v. Loyal’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
48
cited by 48 later decisions
3
states following
July 2017
most recently cited
4 district · 44 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Faretta v. California · Benton v. Maryland · United States v. Jorn · Arizona v. Washington · Wheat v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]his rule shall not alter the effect of case law or ethics opinions that: ... (2) in certain cases or situations creating an appearance of impropriety rather than an actual conflict, multiple representation is not permissible, that is, in those situations in which the ordinary knowledgeable citizen acquainted ivith the facts would conclude that the multiple representation poses a substantial risk of disservice to either the public interest or the interest of one of the clients.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“valued right to have his trial completed by a particular tribunal....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.