164 Ohio App. 3d 155 - State v. Wenzlick’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2013
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blakemore v. Blakemore · Ungar v. Sarafite · State v. Unger · State v. Bayless · United States v. Burton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Among the considerations that should be evaluated in reviewing a trial court's exercise of discretion are the length of the delay requested; whether other continuances have been requested and granted; any inconvenience to the litigants, witnesses, opposing counsel, and the court; whether the requested delay is for legitimate reasons or is merely dilatory, purposeful, or contrived; whether the defendant contributed to the circumstance that gives rise to the request for a continuance; and any other relevant factors, depending on the unique facts of each case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.