164 Ohio App. 3d 26 - State v. Primous’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “This section is designed to prohibit forgery where the subject of the offense is not a writing but an object. Among other things, the section prohibits the increasingly common practices of simulating antique furniture, or of counterfeiting phonograph records.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. City of E. Cleveland v. Hall

2. “makes it quite clear that the section applies to forging objects and not a writing, such as forging antiques or phonograph records.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. City of E. Cleveland v. Hall

3. “passing a bad check does not fit under the ambit of criminal simulation.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. City of E. Cleveland v. Hall