Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 164 OHIOAPP3D 372 - State v. Sheppard

State v. Sheppard’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
4
states following
January 2016
most recently cited

22 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Crawford v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · State v. Bradley · Darden v. Wainwright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Moreover, courts have found that `failure to conduct such a voir dire * * * is not fatal to the admissibility of evidence under Evid. R. 803(4), if the medical professional and child are available for cross-examination.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “When the declarant appears for cross-examination at trial, the Confrontation Clause places no constraints at all on the use of [her] prior testimonial statements.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “nothing in the record [indicated] that [the victim] would have realized that her statements would be available for use at a later trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.