Sneed v. Sneed’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 2021
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 31 Kan. App. 2d 398 - McNabb Ex Rel. Foshee v. McNabb · Windsor v. Windsor · 27 Va. App. 136 - Franklin v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Franklin · In Re the Marriage of Malwitz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“of the non residential parent and, as such, personal jurisdiction is appropriate under the UIFSA statute. Additionally, it seems clear that where there is a single incident of abuse or where there is no testimony of specific facts of such abuse, personal jurisdiction is not appropriate under UIFSA. Id. at 503 (citations omitted). {¶ 18} After reviewing the record, the court held that the daughter's testimony describing a pattern of abuse, which continued within a few months of the family moving to Ohio, was sufficient to establish that the husband's”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Based upon an analysis of the above case law, it appears that where there is a pattern of abuse or harassment, the resident parent will be considered to have fled as a result of the "acts and directives" of the non residential parent and, as such, personal jurisdiction is appropriate under the UIFSA statute. Additionally, it seems clear that where there is a single incident of abuse or where there is no testimony of specific facts of such abuse, personal jurisdiction is not appropriate under UIFSA.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In a proceeding to establish, enforce, or modify a support order or to determine the existence or nonexistence of a parent and child relationship, a tribunal or support enforcement agency of this state may exercise personal jurisdiction over a nonresident individual if any of the following is the case: * * * (E) The child resides in this state as a result of the acts or directives of the individual; * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.