Jelinek v. Abbott Laboratories’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blakemore v. Blakemore · United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens · State v. Apanovitch · Posin v. A. B. C. Motor Court Hotel, Inc. · Mauzy v. Kelly Services, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(A) For any employer, because of the * * * age * * * of any person, to discharge without just cause, to refuse to hire, or otherwise to discriminate against that person with respect to hire, tenure, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, or any matter directly or indirectly related to employment.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“), as to appellant's claim for age discrimination, awarding appellant $700,000 in compensatory damages and $25,000,000 in punitive damages, as well as attorney fees. See Jelinek v. Abbott Laboratories, 164 Ohio App.3d 607 , 2005-Ohio-5696, ¶ 23 (10th Dist.) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[was] a member of a statutorily protected class, he was subject to adverse action, he was qualified for the position, and he was replaced by a person of substantially younger age.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.