Muller v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2011
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“amounts to mere question begging[.] If [the plaintiff] is entitled to a remedy, then [the plaintiff] must establish the invalidity of the agency action in the first place. We merely hold that the exclusive mechanism for establishing the invalidity of the agency action is provided in the APA.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the validity of an agency action on the ground that it `violated a statute or rule or was otherwise in violation of administrative law,'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“APA review is inadequate, because the remedy [the plaintiff] seeksdamagesis not available under the APA.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.