Diggins v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2009
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on McDermott, Inc. v. AmClyde · Petrolane Inc. v. Robles
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“now stands as a decision of this court and as such [] has prece-dential effect. Today's opinion is right in holding that it controls the outcome of this case. Based on the principle of stare decisis I join in the result that today's opinion reaches even though I remain convinced that [the recently decided case] was wrongly decided.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.