Frantz v. Schroeder’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““The object of this provision of the Compensation Law [sub-sec. 4 of sec. 18, as amended] is to prevent imposition and fraud, but it is not intended to relieve an employer from the obligation to pay compensation within the limit fixed by the statute during the disability caused by the injury to the disabled workman, whether the objective symptoms have disappeared or not. It is only necessary that there should have been ‘objective conditions or symptoms proven/ and such subjective result as may be imputed to the original objective condition is compensable under the law.” (Italics ours.)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Frantz v. Schroeder

2. “All compensation payments provided for in this act, shall mean and be defined to be for injuries and only such injuries as are proven by competent evidence, of which there are or have been objective conditions or symptoms proven, not within the physical or mental control of the injured employee himself.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 23 So. 2d 661 - Vega v. Higgins Industries