Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 164 So. 3d 259 - State v. Boyd

164 So. 3d 259 - State v. Boyd’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · McMann v. Richardson · State Ex Rel. Melinie v. State · Burger v. Kemp · State v. Dorthey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he trial judge who imposed the sentence initially is uniquely situated to determine whether any errors by counsel at sentencing would have resulted in a substantially less harsh sentence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “We therefore remand the matter to the trial court for a full evidentiary hearing and decision on [the defendant's] ineffective-assistance-of-counsel-at-sentencing claim. See Sparks , 88-0017, p. 66; 68 So.3d at 485 (citing State v. Strickland , 94-0025, p. 51 (La. 11/1/96), 683 So.2d 218 , 238-9 ).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.