Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

164 So. 3d 72

C.J.H. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2015-05-06

Relies on 98 So. 3d 730 - Fernandez v. State

Decided 2015-05-06

PER CURIAM.

¶1C.J.H. challenges his disposition and restitution orders. We affirm the disposition order without comment. But because the restitution order is not supported by competent, substantial evidence we reverse for a new restitution hearing.1See Fernandez v. State, 98 So.3d 730, 731-32 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012).

¶2Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

CASANUEVA, KHOUZAM, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.

¶3. We find no merit in C.J.H.’s other challenge to the restitution award.

/164/so3d/72 · .json · Public domain