¶1See Neal v. State, 142 So.3d 883, 890 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (affirming conviction *789and sentence because, despite shortcomings in Anders
¶2AFFIRMED.
¶3. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
164 So. 3d 788
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 28, 2015
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2015-05-28
Relies on Anders v. California · Neal v. State
Decided 2015-05-28
¶1See Neal v. State, 142 So.3d 883, 890 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (affirming conviction *789and sentence because, despite shortcomings in Anders
¶2AFFIRMED.
¶3. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).