Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

164 So. 3d 96

Page v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2015-05-06

Relies on 997 So. 2d 403 - In Re Standard Instruct. in Cr. Cases No. 2007-10 · 121 So. 3d 409 - Daniels v. State · 160 So. 3d 63 - Steve Lawrence Griffin v. State of Florida

Decided 2015-05-06

PER CURIAM.

¶1In accordance with the Florida Supreme Court’s order dated February 19, 2014 in the matter of Page v. State, SC12-314, quashing this Court’s February 8, 2012 *97opinion and remanding for reconsideration, we withdraw our opinion in 3D10-534 and substitute the following in its. place:

¶2Tedrick Page appeals from a conviction of second degree murder as charged. The only point presented arises from the fact that the jury was instructed in accordance with the interim manslaughter by act instruction. See In re Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases, (2007-10), 997 So.2d 403 (Fla.2008). The issue before us is whether that instruction erroneously stated the required elements of the crime, and whether that instruction is fundamental error. We hold that, in accordance with Daniels v. State, 121 So.3d 409 (Fla. 2013), and Griffin v. State, 160 So.3d 63 (Fla.2015), the error is fundamental and we reverse and remand for a new trial.

¶3Reversed and remanded for new trial.

/164/so3d/96 · .json · Public domain