Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 164 SW3D 464 - Trevino v. State

Trevino v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2006
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Rinaldi v. Yeager · Phynes v. State · Ruedas v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The cornerstone of the restricted appeal from an adjudication hearing is not that the right to appeal is a legislatively created right, as this court has erroneously stated in the past. Rather, it is that the constitutionally — grounded right to appeal may be regulated by the legislature. [3] Specifically, "in this state, the right of appeal is conferred only by the Constitution, with such exceptions or limitations as the legislature directs by statute." [4] Constitutional guarantees of due process and equal protection require that once the right to appeal a criminal conviction exists, it must be fairly applied. [5]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “premise that the Texas Constitution does not provide a right to appellate review of criminal convictions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.