Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 164 U.S. 691 - Ex parte Jones

Ex parte Jones’s Empirical Analysis

164 U.S. 691 · 1897

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
11
cited 11 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
October 1951
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions (11 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1951 · most notably Delaware Lackawanna Western Railroad Company v. Matt Yurkonis (1915), Louis Loeb v. Trustees of Columbia Township (1900)

5 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

2401897190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from First Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Mattox v. United States · Osborn v. President Directors and Company of the Bank of the United States · Union Pac. Ry. Co. v. Myers · Alexander v. United States · Carver v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““That all national banking associations established under the laws of the United States shall, for the -purposes of all actions by or against them, real, personal or mixed, and all suits in equity, be deemed citizens of the states in which they are respectively located; and in such cases the Circuit and District Courts shall not have jurisdiction other than such as they would have in cases between individual citizens of the same state.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.